Security Assessment
An honest account of where you stand, written so you can act on it.
The problem
Security reports arrive as a list of findings nobody can prioritize, and the organization does nothing because everything appears urgent.
What we do
We review authentication, authorization, access control, patching, backups, email authentication and public exposure, and report what we actually checked — separately from what we could not check. Findings are prioritized by real risk to your organization, not by a generic severity score.
We will not tell you a system is secure. We will tell you what was tested, what passed, what failed, and what remains unverified.
Who this is for
Organizations with real data to protect and no dedicated security staff.
What you receive
- Written findings, prioritized by risk to you
- A clear statement of what was and was not tested
- Remediation plan with effort estimates
- A working session to go through it
How it works
Consultation
Scope and written authorization.
Assessment
Review and testing.
Delivery
Findings and remediation plan.
Support
Re-test after remediation, if wanted.
What we need from you
- Written authorization to test the systems in scope
- A named technical contact for the duration
- Agreement on testing windows
These become your onboarding checklist — generated from the services you choose, so you are not asked for anything this work does not need.
Questions
Will you tell us we are secure afterwards?
No. We will tell you what was tested, what passed, what failed and what was not covered. Anyone who tells you a system is secure is describing a feeling, not a finding.
Do you need written authorization?
Yes, before anything is tested, and it has to come from someone with authority to give it.